An argument against the general application of the psychodynamic theory

Selected essays on intention and agency, Cambridge, England: Toulmin believes that a good argument can succeed in providing good justification to a claim, which will stand up to criticism and earn a favourable verdict.

And what do those norms indicate about what we ought to do do. The good in the right: For example, if a person tries to convince a listener that he is a British citizen, the claim would be "I am a British citizen. These resistances can take the form of suddenly changing the topic, falling into silence, or trying to discontinue the treatment altogether.

A contrary view holds that moral reasons are necessarily general, whether because the sources of their justification are all general or because a moral claim is ill-formed if it contains particularities.

The new morality, Louisville: This is the principle that conflict between distinct moral or practical considerations can be rationally resolved only on the basis of some third principle or consideration that is both more general and more firmly warranted than the two initial competitors.

Facts about the nature of moral inference and moral reasoning may have important direct implications for moral theory. So do moral principles and moral commitments.

Freud coined the word "transference" to refer to this ubiquitous psychological phenomenon, and it remains one of the most powerful explanatory tools in psychoanalysis today—both in the clinical setting and when psychoanalysts use their theory to explain human behavior.

Whether such an attempt could succeed would depend, in part, on the extent to which we have an actual grasp of first-order reasons, conflict among which can be settled solely on the basis of their comparative strength.

In the case of independent individuals reasoning morally with one another, we may expect that moral disagreement provides the occasion rather than an obstacle.

Words or phrases expressing the speaker's degree of force or certainty concerning the claim. Admittedly, less the unemployed and the welfare recipients than the enforcers in matters of preparation for the professional future — teachers, managers, and politicians. Another exception to the extinction rule is an operant conditioned response that has been conditioned by intermittent schedules of reinforcement.

Moral Reasoning

Sinnott-Armstrong suggested that a moral dilemma is a situation in which the following are true of a single agent: Although many experiments have been done showing evidence of both Pavlovian conditioning and operant conditioning, all of these experiments have been based on animals and their behavior.

Casuistry, thus understood, is an indispensable aid to moral reasoning. Each of these forms might be stated evaluatively or deontically. Ethics without principles, Oxford: Yet this is not a sound footing for arguing that moral reasoning, beyond simply attending to the moral facts, is always unnecessary.

Given that numerous experiments have shown there is merit in the behaviorist theory, certain ideas of this theory can be used in the treatment of disorders.

What moral knowledge we are capable of will depend, in part, on what sorts of moral reasoning we are capable of. A calculative sort of utilitarianism, perhaps, might be imagined according to which there is no need to spot a moral issue or difficulty, as every choice node in life presents the agent with the same, utility-maximizing task.

In Pavlov's experiment the tone was the neutral stimulus that was associated with the unconditioned stimulus of food. Merely an illusory alternative.

Preface to shakespeare essays argumentative essay about money is the route of all evil, retrospective study research paper conscription essays self esteem scientific research paper short essay on rock music perks of being a wallflower essay nz essay on national and international issues.

Psychology is known for the rather wide range of its subjects. As Sunstein notes Sunsteinchap. Darwin himself was blissfully ignorant of the functions and structure of the cell.

A low-information voter may base their ballot box decision on a media sound-bite, or a flier received in the mail.

Contact hypothesis

We may group these around the following seven questions: The nature and possibility of collective reasoning within an organized collective body has recently been the subject of some discussion. Some of our dumbfounding and confusion has been laid at the feet of our having both a fast, more emotional way of processing moral stimuli and a slow, more cognitive way e.

A closing argument, or summation, is the concluding statement of each party's counsel reiterating the important arguments for the trier of fact, often the jury, in a court case. As soon as it is recognized though, another reinforcement occurs and the extinction of the reinforcement now takes even longer to recognize.

The Journal of Sex Research. When first proposed, this layout of argumentation is based on legal arguments and intended to be used to analyze the rationality of arguments typically found in the courtroom; in fact, Toulmin did not realize that this layout would be applicable to the field of rhetoric and communication until his works were introduced to rhetoricians by Wayne Brockriede and Douglas Ehninger.

With the ideas of behaviorism, vast improvements can be made in the treatment of neurosis and phobias. For instance, the claims that Freud's data were either "flawed or invalid" indicate that Freud's theory is not scientifically based, a rather large, influential argument against the theory.

Psychodynamic Approach

The comments against Freud's technique of free association fuel the debate on whether his. Psychology is known for the rather wide range of its subjects. Whether it is work or love, Christianity or suicide, school or war – with all these topics it knows its responsibility for the explanation of the role that the subject plays in the process.

Natural law theory is a legal theory that recognizes law and morality as deeply connected, if not one and the same. Morality relates to what is right and wrong and what is good and bad. Morality relates to what is right and wrong and what is good and bad. The Comparison between Psychodynamic and Humanistic Theory There are very distinct differences between Psychodynamic and Humanistic Counselling but both ultimately offer the help and guidance to discover why we act the way we do and why we make certain choices in our lives.

To be sure, most great philosophers who have addressed the nature of moral reasoning were far from agnostic about the content of the correct moral theory, and developed their reflections about moral reasoning in support of or in derivation from their moral theory.

In "Behaviorism as a Theory of Personality: A Critical Look," Naik raises many valid arguments against the merits of behavioral theory as a theory of personality.

On the whole, I am in agreement with Naik's rejection of behaviorism as a comprehensive theory.

An argument against the general application of the psychodynamic theory
Rated 0/5 based on 43 review
Pseudoscience - Wikipedia