The tournament spans several weeks, with student athletes missing a minimum of six days of class. If they were employees at a company, missing extended time would result in an absolute dismissal. Student-athletes are the ones working hard out on the court and field. You know what athletes receive as a bonus.
Getting paid to play college ball might actually make it easier to look at school as more of an opportunity worth taking. Yet, no player can benefit from that work.
Nobody would feel sorry for players who get greedy and end up breaking the rules. If a car dealer wants to strike that deal then good for the player in question. Even with any type of scholarship, college athletes are typically dead broke.
The teachers let us do our work from the road, but the job wasn't going to pay you just because you were playing basketball on a road trip. Because of strict NCAA rules, there are hundreds of student athletes that risk eligibility each semester just trying to make ends meet.
Using the inability to distribute the funds equally as an impediment is an excuse, a rather intellectually lazy one at that. Even though the numbers may not be quite the same, anything players can learn about money in college can go a long way towards saving more of it when they get to the pros.
But now in the 21st century, the NCAA is a billion dollar company. Why would players stay in school when they can get to the big leagues and have some of those material possessions that many students flaunt. So why would we pay athletes if entire teams are struggling to survive.
Why hasn't anything changed. Typically, an athlete will wake up before dawn, work out, eat, and then go to an 8 or 9am class. Athletes earn their schools hundreds of thousands of dollars, increase enrollment, and if they do well, provide a recruiting piece for generations.
They provide an education and everything that goes with it; all they ask for in return is your peak performance on the field. After all, the athletic departments at many D1 schools bring in more money alone than any other department.
Getting paid to play in college can make it easier to stay in school when a player's draft stock can be improved, experience at the collegiate level enhanced and education on and off the field furthered. We were on the road all the time, even gone for two straight weeks at one point.
Most profits from college athletics do not go towards academics. The players have become employees of the universities and conferences as much as students -- employees with no compensation, which not only violates common decency but perhaps even the law.
Nothing about the way hundreds of millions of dollars is distributed is equitable or even fair. Since they aren't really obligated to get a degree or graduate, are they truly under contract or are they really NCAA employees.
First, their own coaches.
Would athletes be paid differently depending on the sport they play. Does the employer control or dictate the actions of the employee. He would work his butt off all day, with two or sometimes three basketball training sessions, plus classes and homework, and go to that job for a few hours late at night.
Players are asked to come to institutions where they are not social equals and yet they are expected to feel good about the situation and themselves. What do you think. While athletes have to stay in school for a minimum of two years before entering the NFL, more recently the NBA has implemented a similar rule of one year out of high school.
The truth is that full scholarships can be great for students who get extra money from their parents but for those who don't, life can be hard.
Students are not professional athletes who are paid salaries and incentives for a career in sports. They are students receiving access to a college education through their participation in sports.
Feb 19, · I have to debate why college athletes should not be paid, and why they currently aren't being paid. I need some good valid points and arguments as I am going to go head to head with someone arguing why they should be janettravellmd.com: Resolved.
If the student as athlete can find a way, he/she should be able to endorse products, to have paid-speaking gigs, to sell memorabilia, as Allen Sack, the author and professor at the college of. Jan 30, · 21 Reasons Why Student-Athletes Are Employees And Should Be Allowed To Unionize Marc Edelman Contributor Opinions expressed by Forbes Contributors are their own.
7 Common Sense Reasons Why College Athletes Should Be Paid (According to Jay Bilas) I asked Mr. Bilas to explain in simple terms why college athletes deserve to be paid.
This is what he told me. The pros list the arguments for why college athletes should be paid and the cons list the arguments for why college athletes should not be paid. Check out our student loan calculator. Pro #1: College athletes put their bodies on the line each game they play.The reasons why college athletes should be payed